Some books are just fun to read. They may be somewhat serious but that doesn't mean they can't be light as well. Sometimes a book is borderline, not quite light and not quite serious. Hunt for Red October was serious; One for the Money is not. Today's book is one in between. I once read a critique of the Wilder/Ford movie Cisco Kid which said the movie couldn't make up its mind if it were a drama or a comedy which offended me. Not just because I liked the movie, although I did, but because life is neither all serious nor all comedy. Now we have all sorts of "dramedies", those movies that are comedies with lots of drama thrown in. TV shows as well. Mike Fontenot's Solution Squares is just the opposite, a drama with comedy thrown in much like NCIS. Written lightly about some very serious goings on, it is indeed interesting.
Solution Squared
By Michael P. Fontenot
Published by Center Mass Books
lengt: 446 pages
ISBN 1-453-83240-8
From old favorites to new friends, books keep us company, take us to another world, or give us hope.
Saturday, April 28, 2012
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Get a FREE copy of Doxology !!
It's not often that we get an author willing to give out free books, so here's your chance. We've done reviews here at A Book a Day Reviews, so check out what we had to say, and get your copy for free while you can! The instructions are at the bottom of this post.
-Gabriella Wheeler
Read my review of Doxology here -- Gabriella
Read my interview with Brian Holers here -- Gabriella
Fathers,
sons and brothers reconnect over tragedy in this blue-collar Southern
tale of love, loss and the healing power of community and family.
Read
the first chapter here >>
http://brianholers.com/books/doxology-chapter-1/
Doxology
does for small town Louisiana men what Steel Magnolias did for
small-town Louisiana women, exposing flaws while showcasing their
inner strengths. It is a tale of grandfathers, fathers, sons and
brothers, and recreates family dynamics and memories in a way that
forms a doxology, a song of praise for the male family bond, the
emotional ties men conceal from the world and each other.
About
Doxology
After
a lifetime of abuse and loss--from fights with other boys staged for
his father's entertainment, to the death of his only son-- sixty one
year old Vernon Davidson is angry. He's ready to get back at God, his
paper mill coworkers, and everyone else in his north Louisiana town.
Constantly drunk to numb his pain, the normally cautious Vernon
spirals into recklessness; drinking on the job, facing down a younger
man at work over a parking spot, scandalizing his former fellow
Baptists with displays of his nakedness. Meanwhile Jody Davidson,
Vernon's estranged nephew, struggles to survive a similarly tragic
past by self-imposed exile, inserting himself into a new, seemingly
different family a thousand miles away. The two men are reunited when
Vernon agrees to retrieve Jody for his dying brother so they can say
goodbye-and that's when they each embark on a journey that will
ultimately change their lives.
Brian
Holers’ Doxology examines an impossibly difficult question: how
does a man go about forgiving a God he has grown to despise after the
tragedies and endless disappointments he has faced?
Follow
Vernon and Jody on their road from loss to healing in this deep and
moving book that will challenge and surprise you, as it takes you
deep into the backwaters of rural Louisiana.
The
Reviews Are In
"
An Engaging and Haunting Southern Tale" ~Alle Wells, Southern
Writer
“The
story of fathers and sons, brothers and cousins, had me laughing out
loud one minute and bawling like a baby the next.” ~A. Chambers,
Book Blogger
“The
author shapes his characters with love and respect. In writing of the
Southern world in which these men reside, he avoids the use of
dialect. Instead, he skillfully builds the cadence of life particular
to the rural South with words pictures of that slower lifestyle. His
characters meander through the telling of slow, roundabout tales,
always interrupted with side forays to detail the family connections
of everyone in that story. Friends, as well as strangers, visit
through the open window of dusty pickups, lean on a broom or shovel
throughout a conversation because the work will still be there after
all the local news is exchanged. The reader longs to be sipping the
sweet iced tea in the afternoon heat, to smell the smoke from the
local barbeque pit before diving into a plate of tender ribs, or to
taste the yeasty beer or sharp slide of whiskey across the tongue
after the sun goes down.” ~Suzanne G, Author
“Call
me a feminist, but I have never read anything so `emotional' written
by a man. No offense to all the other male writers, but somewhere
down the line, I find that they are usually unable to tap into
emotions as well as the female authors do. But Brian Holers has
managed to break through that and has captured the true essence of
emotional ties/bonds that make a family.” ~Book Blogger
Read
the first chapter here >>
http://brianholers.com/books/doxology-chapter-1/
v
Get
your FREE copy of Doxology
today only on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Doxology-ebook/dp/B005SL5VOG/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1334247821&sr=1-1
No eReader or
Kindle? No problem. Get free apps for your Web Browser, PC, Mac,
iPhone, iPad, BlackBerry, or Android Phone.
Here's
the link to use:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=dig_arl_box?ie=UTF8&docId=1000493771
Monday, April 23, 2012
The Secular Monastery: Chess anyone?
Sometimes I think of the weirdest stuff when getting ready to write a review. I mean, do you think you could compare books to sports? Still, they are a lot alike. Some books are full out action with tons of hits and danger like, say, demolition derby (do those still exist?) Others have an abundance of hitting and action but with some down time between the action like boxing. Others are slow and intricate and would be closest to golf where half the action is in the set up and delivery before every impact. Then there are some books that are like chess. The action is not as important as the intricate way the pieces fit together to complete the game. The action is all in the brain, no hits, no jabs, just straight out mental maneuvering. And the thing is, different people like different sports for, well, different reasons. Not only that, but some people like a little bit of them all. Those who like football for the action may not like the slow delivery of baseball but those that enjoy both the action and the play calling of football, might well enjoy the stats and gamesmanship of baseball.
The Secular Monastery is one of those books that more closely resembles chess than demolition derby or even football. Pieces and people are moved around the set with great care, building a story that can grab your attention without constantly keeping you off balance by throwing action at you.
From Amazon:
There’s been an apparent terrorist attack on a government laboratory that has been conducting controversial experiments using the smallpox virus. Professor David Turner is surreptitiously tasked by a wary president to investigate the incident independent of a formal commission appointed for the purpose. The assignment makes him an emissary to a powerful watchdog organization that provides indispensable assets but also subjects him to their scrutiny. Seeking to assure his independence, David enlists an American student with Iranian parentage to help him weigh evidence that Iran was responsible for the attack. He also develops an increasingly consequential relationship with an aide to the President assigned to monitor his project. As he struggles with his assignment under the pressure of politically ominous and potentially violent threat, he taps the deeper currents of global politics and personal relationships. Not able to disentangle his own fate from the outcome of the investigation, he encounters the ambiguities and dangers but also the liberating qualities of truth.
About the book:
David Turner, a widowed university professor, is asked to do an independent review of the bombing of a CDC facility where deadly viruses are stored, including the smallpox virus. No one know why the bombing occurred but there are many theories. The president, a somewhat distant friend of David's, doesn't fully trust the independent nature of the government commission looking into the bombing so he calls on David. He doesn't want David tainted by the official commission and so has put him in touch with Hayden Hall, a totally independent group of people with enough finances and connections to help David with a full scale investigation. The president also gives him Amy, a presidential aide, who will keep him advised on things coming from the White House.
David is stunned by the 'appointment' but takes it on despite his misgivings. He meets with the Hayden Hall people and finds their resources shocking. In some ways it rivals the government's own reach. After a thorough interview, the people there decide to help David uncover the truth about the bombing of the clinic. There are those, however, who will go to great lengths to stop David from reporting the wrong information to the president. There are those who have hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, who have a vested interest in what David choses to report.
Lastly, can David really trust Amy? The president thinks so but men have been lead astray before. And there is the bit that happened in the Middle East to think about when adding up the trust points. And was Amy just a little too quick to 'like' David?
My Take:
I enjoyed this story. Actually, I enjoyed it quite a lot except for a minor thing or two. First, the writing is good and the language is a little upscale which is a nice change from books written at an eighth grade comprehension level. But it does mean an occasional, "What does that word mean?" or "I may have to get the dictionary!" or" I haven't seen that word in months!" response. I think what it means to me is I'm not reading up to my grade level most of the time.
The flow of the text is good, as well. I mean, I have to appreciate someone who can come up with a character who says things like: “What can be proved and what I need to know rarely dance together."
Steinbruner weaves an intricate pattern with tiny threads coming from nowhere - or so it seems - but that fit perfectly well. The investigation feels just like an investigation should. Bits of information here, a phone number there, a witness who sees nothing but doesn't know that they know something are all weaved into a pattern that becomes clear before the end of the book. Tiny threads actually do lead back to a spool and aren't from nowhere as they might seem in the beginning.
By about halfway through the book I was waiting for the other shoe to drop. You know the feeling. All is going just a little too smoothly. Well, drop it did, but less like a work boot and more like a bedroom slipper. For me that was a little bit disappointing. The twist was a subtle one and if you don't follow the book closely you might not get the full impact of the twist. But the book itself is a case of subtle writing where the danger is quite real but not in your face real. I will say that I didn't see it coming at all, which is a good thing. The story, because of its subtlety is do close to real life that it is actually scary when one thinks these kinds of maneuvers go on all the time behind mostly closed doors.
I would recommend this to anyone who likes intricate mind games made real. Think of the movie "Sleuth" for instance. If you like following conspiracy theories and watching Senate hearings, if you like following the scent (or money), I think you will really enjoy this book. The writing kept me engaged and the clues and trails kept me turning the page.
Want more? Try this interview.
The Secular Monastery is one of those books that more closely resembles chess than demolition derby or even football. Pieces and people are moved around the set with great care, building a story that can grab your attention without constantly keeping you off balance by throwing action at you.
- The Secular Monastery
- By John D. Steinbruner
- Paperback: 284 pages
- Publisher: CreateSpace (September 28, 2011)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 1461164621
- ISBN-13: 978-1461164623
From Amazon:
There’s been an apparent terrorist attack on a government laboratory that has been conducting controversial experiments using the smallpox virus. Professor David Turner is surreptitiously tasked by a wary president to investigate the incident independent of a formal commission appointed for the purpose. The assignment makes him an emissary to a powerful watchdog organization that provides indispensable assets but also subjects him to their scrutiny. Seeking to assure his independence, David enlists an American student with Iranian parentage to help him weigh evidence that Iran was responsible for the attack. He also develops an increasingly consequential relationship with an aide to the President assigned to monitor his project. As he struggles with his assignment under the pressure of politically ominous and potentially violent threat, he taps the deeper currents of global politics and personal relationships. Not able to disentangle his own fate from the outcome of the investigation, he encounters the ambiguities and dangers but also the liberating qualities of truth.
About the book:
David Turner, a widowed university professor, is asked to do an independent review of the bombing of a CDC facility where deadly viruses are stored, including the smallpox virus. No one know why the bombing occurred but there are many theories. The president, a somewhat distant friend of David's, doesn't fully trust the independent nature of the government commission looking into the bombing so he calls on David. He doesn't want David tainted by the official commission and so has put him in touch with Hayden Hall, a totally independent group of people with enough finances and connections to help David with a full scale investigation. The president also gives him Amy, a presidential aide, who will keep him advised on things coming from the White House.
David is stunned by the 'appointment' but takes it on despite his misgivings. He meets with the Hayden Hall people and finds their resources shocking. In some ways it rivals the government's own reach. After a thorough interview, the people there decide to help David uncover the truth about the bombing of the clinic. There are those, however, who will go to great lengths to stop David from reporting the wrong information to the president. There are those who have hundreds of millions of dollars on the line, who have a vested interest in what David choses to report.
Lastly, can David really trust Amy? The president thinks so but men have been lead astray before. And there is the bit that happened in the Middle East to think about when adding up the trust points. And was Amy just a little too quick to 'like' David?
My Take:
I enjoyed this story. Actually, I enjoyed it quite a lot except for a minor thing or two. First, the writing is good and the language is a little upscale which is a nice change from books written at an eighth grade comprehension level. But it does mean an occasional, "What does that word mean?" or "I may have to get the dictionary!" or" I haven't seen that word in months!" response. I think what it means to me is I'm not reading up to my grade level most of the time.
The flow of the text is good, as well. I mean, I have to appreciate someone who can come up with a character who says things like: “What can be proved and what I need to know rarely dance together."
Steinbruner weaves an intricate pattern with tiny threads coming from nowhere - or so it seems - but that fit perfectly well. The investigation feels just like an investigation should. Bits of information here, a phone number there, a witness who sees nothing but doesn't know that they know something are all weaved into a pattern that becomes clear before the end of the book. Tiny threads actually do lead back to a spool and aren't from nowhere as they might seem in the beginning.
By about halfway through the book I was waiting for the other shoe to drop. You know the feeling. All is going just a little too smoothly. Well, drop it did, but less like a work boot and more like a bedroom slipper. For me that was a little bit disappointing. The twist was a subtle one and if you don't follow the book closely you might not get the full impact of the twist. But the book itself is a case of subtle writing where the danger is quite real but not in your face real. I will say that I didn't see it coming at all, which is a good thing. The story, because of its subtlety is do close to real life that it is actually scary when one thinks these kinds of maneuvers go on all the time behind mostly closed doors.
I would recommend this to anyone who likes intricate mind games made real. Think of the movie "Sleuth" for instance. If you like following conspiracy theories and watching Senate hearings, if you like following the scent (or money), I think you will really enjoy this book. The writing kept me engaged and the clues and trails kept me turning the page.
Want more? Try this interview.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)