The Breakout Principle
Herbert Benson, MD, and Willkam Proctor
Scribner, NY, NY 2004 (paperback)
Every profession and occupation suffers
from it: sport figures, writers, scientists, even religious clerics.
“It” is the problem that crops up in everyone's life, for some
more often than others, where no matter how hard you work, no matter
how much you study or practice or run scenarios, there's a situation
that you have to do something about which is very critical, and a
wrong decision could harm you in many ways, a situation that seems
utterly unsolvable, beyond the scope of your powers, and no matter
how much you think about it, has no good answer.
Whether it's a baseball player's slump,
writers block, a piece of computer software code that just won't
behave, or a family situation that's been keeping you up nights for
months: you've worked on it and worked on it, going around in
circles trying to find an answer, but nothing works. Then you make
some very rude remarks, and go golfing. But even then your mind is
still on the problem, and your golf game suffers. You go home and
try to attack the problem again, but no go. Finally and completely
giving up for the night, you decide to drown your sorrows in a very
long, hot shower. And all of a sudden, there you are, jumping out of
the shower to write down the answer that suddenly popped unbidden
into your head. This is what Benson and Proctor call the “Breakout
Principle.”
I've seen this happen in my own life,
when I worked at a university. Someone would be in the lab early in
the am having come in in the middle of the night because they'd been
working on something and gotten “stuck” for weeks, went home in
disgust, took a shower, went to bed, and boom, they woke up with a
fully formed answer and they had to get into work immediately to see
if they were right.
The elements involved vary a lot from
person to person. Some folks take a shower, some knit (there are
interesting comments on the emergence of “male knitting”), some
put together toy models or do crossword puzzles, or take to
meditation and prayer. The key is having all the raw material in
your head (from actually doing the homework and taking responsibility
for solving the dilemma), and then letting go to allow your
unconscious mind, or your spirit, or whatever actor is doing the
“thinking” while you're out of the loop, do it's job. Benson
and Proctor did research to determine if there were differences in
brain behavior during stress, when someone was struggling, when they
were taking time off from thinking about it, and after one of the
“aha” moments, etc., and their work is extremely interesting,
both for what it tells us, and for what is still part of the ongoing
mystery.
Our grandparents used to tell us things
like “sleep on it before you make a decision,” “put it on the
back burner for awhile and do something else,” “just walk away
and try again later.” What Breakout Principle tells us, is that
they were right. The why is still a bit murky, because there are
wide differences in what works for different people. For some,
spirituality is the key, for others, repetitive tasks like gardening
or needlepoint. Those with creative endeavors are often seen as
weird or flaky because they routinely do things that seem unrelated
to what they're striving to complete. Creative computer start-up
companies began with play rooms and gyms and other “unprofessional”
activities that served just that purpose, a break from the relentless
pressure of making a new company work. Writers often talk about
mulling over complicated stories or descriptions for days or weeks,
and then just sitting and writing nonstop for hours, the entire
project forming itself in their mind, complete, and all the writer
had to do was write it down.
What is interesting to me about this
book are the implications for many different aspects of our lives,
from family interactions to social policy.
Do we break out to discover new
“outside the box” answers only when we've struggled intensely
with a problem and then let go? Do we need the stress of trying to
solve the puzzle in the first place – do we need to be outside our
comfort zone in order to grow and learn in new ways? If we stay
within our comfort zones, do we stagnate? In a time period when may
people complain about the “status quo” and want real change, but
are still locked into patterns of politics and beliefs that appear
unchangeable, how important is knowing how to think “outside the
box,” and do we have to “give up” to find the answers? Can
people step back from complex problems to do a better job of solving
them?
The strategies that are described in
this book (with lots of examples from their research) are very
useful, the Breakout Principle described as sort of a “swiss army
knife” for self-help, and for that reason alone I'd recommend this
book. The writing can get a bit repetitive, as many similar stories
are told over and over again, but I'm a sucker for books that help us
see in more self-aware ways, and learn not only how we “tick” but
how we find a path to individual growth and creativity.
This book has been around awhile
without a lot of fanfare, but I think it's an important one that
should be read and considered, both for its self help suggestions,
and for its research, helping us to understand how we can break old
patterns and succeed brilliantly in our endeavors.
This is really great. Thanks for posting! ^_^
ReplyDeleteHey, found your blog on Book Blogs. New follower here. Please check out my blog when you get the chance. http://falln2books.blogspot.com
ReplyDeleteThanks!
Checked out your blog this morning (and am following). Love your rating system and may do something like it. There are so many books that I like or love but that don't fit in the 5 star rating!
ReplyDelete